Aquinas, Thomas

« Aquinas, Thomas (1224/6-74) Aquinas lived an active, demanding academic and ecclesiastical life that ended while he was still in his forties.

He nonetheless produced many works, varying in length from a few pages to a fewvolumes.

Because his writings grew out of his activities as a teacher in the Dominican order and a member of thetheology faculty of the University of Paris, most are concerned with what he and his contemporaries thought of astheology.

However, much of academic theology in the Middle Ages consisted in a rational investigation of the mostfundamental aspects of reality in general and of human nature and behaviour in particular.

That vast domain obviouslyincludes much of what is now considered to be philosophy, and is reflected in the broad subject matter of Aquinas' theological writings.

The scope and philosophical character of medieval theology as practised by Aquinas can be easilyseen in his two most important works, Summa contra gentiles (Synopsis [of Christian Doctrine] Directed Against Unbelievers) and Summa theologiae (Synopsis of Theology) .

However, many of the hundreds of topics covered in those two large works are also investigated in more detail in the smaller works resulting from Aquinas' numerous academic disputations (something like a cross between formal debates and twentieth-century graduate seminars), which heconducted in his various academic posts.

Some of those topics are taken up differently again in his commentaries onworks by Aristotle and other authors.

Although Aquinas is remarkably consistent in his several discussions of the sametopic, it is often helpful to examine parallel passages in his writings when fully assessing his views on any issue.

Aquinas' most obvious philosophical connection is with Aristotle.

Besides producing commentaries on Aristotle's works, he often cites Aristotle in support of a thesis he is defending, even when commenting on Scripture.

There are also in Aquinas' writings many implicit Aristotelian elements, which he had thoroughly absorbed into his own thought.

As a convincedAristotelian, he often adopts Aristotle's critical attitude toward theories associated with Plato, especially the account of ordinary substantial forms as separately existing entities.

However, although Aquinas, like other medieval scholars ofwestern Europe, had almost no access to Plato's works, he was influenced by the writings of Augustine and the pseudo- Dionysius.

Through them he absorbed a good deal of Platonism as well, more than he was in a position to recognize assuch.

On the other hand, Aquinas is the paradigmatic Christian philosopher-theologian, fully aware of his intellectualdebt to religious doctrine.

He was convinced, however, that Christian thinkers should be ready to dispute rationally onany topic, especially theological issues, not only among themselves but also with non-Christians of all sorts.

Since in hisview Jews accept the Old Testament and heretics the New Testament, he thought Christians could argue some issueswith both groups on the basis of commonly accepted religious authority.

However, because other non-Christians, 'for instance, Mohammedans and pagans - do not agree with us about the authority of any scripture on the basis of whichthey can be convinced… it is necessary to have recourse to natural reason, to which everyone is compelled to assent - although where theological issues are concerned it cannot do the whole job' , since some of the data of theology are initially accessible only in Scripture ( Summa contra gentiles I.2.11 ).

Moreover, Aquinas differed from most of his thirteenth-century Christian colleagues in the breadth and depth of his respect for Islamic and Jewish philosopher-theologians, especially Avicenna and Maimonides.

He saw them as valued co-workers in the vast project ofphilosophical theology, clarifying and supporting doctrine by philosophical analysis and argumentation.

His owncommitment to that project involved him in contributing to almost all the areas of philosophy recognized since antiquity,omitting only natural philosophy (the precursor of natural science).

A line of thought with such strong connections topowerful antecedents might have resulted in no more than a pious amalgam.

However, Aquinas' philosophy avoids eclecticism because of his own innovative approach to organizing and reasoning about all the topics included under theoverarching medieval conception of philosophical Christian theology, and because of his special talents for systematicsynthesis and for identifying and skilfully defending, on almost every issue he considers, the most sensible availableposition.

1 Early years Thomas Aquinas was born at Roccasecca, near Naples, the youngest son of a large Italian aristocratic family.

As is generally true of even prominent medieval people, it is hard to determine exactly when he was born; plausible arguments have been offered for 1224, 1225 and 1226.

He began his schooling in the great Benedictine abbey at Monte Cassino(1231-9), and from 1239-44 he was a student at the University of Naples.

In 1244 he joined the Dominican friars, a relativelynew religious order devoted to study and preaching; by doing so he antagonized his family, who seem to have been counting onhis becoming abbot of Monte Cassino.

When the Dominicans ordered Aquinas to go to Paris for further study, his family had himabducted en route and brought home, where he was kept for almost two years.

Near the end of that time his brothers hired aprostitute to try to seduce him, but Aquinas angrily chased her from his room.

Having impressed his family with his high-mindeddetermination, in 1245 Aquinas was allowed to return to the Dominicans, who again sent him to Paris, this time successfully.

Atthe University of Paris, Aquinas first encountered Albert the Great , who quickly became his most influential teacher and eventually his friend and supporter.

When Albert moved on to the University of Cologne in 1248, Aquinas followed him there, havingdeclined Pope Innocent IV 's extraordinary offer to appoint him abbot of Monte Cassino while allowing him to remain a Dominican.

Aquinas seems to have been unusually large, and extremely modest and quiet.

When during his four years at Colognehis special gifts began to be apparent, despite his reticence and humility, Albert assigned the still-reluctant Aquinas his first active. »